Answer Similarity Scorer
Use createAnswerSimilarityScorer
to compare agent outputs against ground truth answers. This scorer is designed for CI/CD testing scenarios where you have expected answers and want to ensure consistency over time.
Installation
npm install @mastra/evals
For complete API documentation and configuration options, see
createAnswerSimilarityScorer
.
Perfect similarity example
In this example, the agent’s output semantically matches the ground truth perfectly.
import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
import { runExperiment } from "@mastra/core/scores";
import { createAnswerSimilarityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/llm";
import { myAgent } from "./agent";
const scorer = createAnswerSimilarityScorer({ model: openai("gpt-4o-mini") });
const result = await runExperiment({
data: [
{
input: "What is 2+2?",
groundTruth: "4"
}
],
scorers: [scorer],
target: myAgent,
});
console.log(result.scores);
Perfect similarity output
The output receives a perfect score because both the agent’s answer and ground truth are identical.
{
"Answer Similarity Scorer": {
score: 1.0,
reason: "The score is 1.0/1 because the output matches the ground truth exactly. The agent correctly provided the numerical answer. No improvements needed as the response is fully accurate."
}
}
High semantic similarity example
In this example, the agent provides the same information as the ground truth but with different phrasing.
import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
import { runExperiment } from "@mastra/core/scores";
import { createAnswerSimilarityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/llm";
import { myAgent } from "./agent";
const scorer = createAnswerSimilarityScorer({ model: openai("gpt-4o-mini") });
const result = await runExperiment({
data: [
{
input: "What is the capital of France?",
groundTruth: "The capital of France is Paris",
}
],
scorers: [scorer],
target: myAgent,
});
console.log(result.scores);
High semantic similarity output
The output receives a high score because it conveys the same information with equivalent meaning.
{
"Answer Similarity Scorer": {
score: 0.9,
reason: "The score is 0.9/1 because both answers convey the same information about Paris being the capital of France. The agent correctly identified the main fact with slightly different phrasing. Minor variation in structure but semantically equivalent."
}
}
Partial similarity example
In this example, the agent’s response is partially correct but missing key information.
import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
import { runExperiment } from "@mastra/core/scores";
import { createAnswerSimilarityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/llm";
import { myAgent } from "./agent";
const scorer = createAnswerSimilarityScorer({ model: openai("gpt-4o-mini") });
const result = await runExperiment({
data: [
{
input: "What are the primary colors?",
groundTruth: "The primary colors are red, blue, and yellow",
}
],
scorers: [scorer],
target: myAgent,
});
console.log(result.scores);
Partial similarity output
The output receives a moderate score because it includes some correct information but is incomplete.
{
"Answer Similarity Scorer": {
score: 0.6,
reason: "The score is 0.6/1 because the answer captures some key elements but is incomplete. The agent correctly identified red and blue as primary colors. However, it missed the critical color yellow, which is essential for a complete answer."
}
}
Contradiction example
In this example, the agent provides factually incorrect information that contradicts the ground truth.
import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
import { runExperiment } from "@mastra/core/scores";
import { createAnswerSimilarityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/llm";
import { myAgent } from "./agent";
const scorer = createAnswerSimilarityScorer({ model: openai("gpt-4o-mini") });
const result = await runExperiment({
data: [
{
input: "Who wrote Romeo and Juliet?",
groundTruth: "William Shakespeare wrote Romeo and Juliet",
}
],
scorers: [scorer],
target: myAgent,
});
console.log(result.scores);
Contradiction output
The output receives a very low score because it contains factually incorrect information.
{
"Answer Similarity Scorer": {
score: 0.0,
reason: "The score is 0.0/1 because the output contains a critical error regarding authorship. The agent correctly identified the play title but incorrectly attributed it to Christopher Marlowe instead of William Shakespeare, which is a fundamental contradiction."
}
}
CI/CD Integration example
Use the scorer in your test suites to ensure agent consistency over time:
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
import { runExperiment } from "@mastra/core/scores";
import { createAnswerSimilarityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/llm";
import { myAgent } from "./agent";
describe('Agent Consistency Tests', () => {
const scorer = createAnswerSimilarityScorer({ model: openai("gpt-4o-mini") });
it('should provide accurate factual answers', async () => {
const result = await runExperiment({
data: [
{
input: "What is the speed of light?",
groundTruth: "The speed of light in vacuum is 299,792,458 meters per second"
},
{
input: "What is the capital of Japan?",
groundTruth: "Tokyo is the capital of Japan"
}
],
scorers: [scorer],
target: myAgent,
});
// Assert all answers meet similarity threshold
expect(result.scores['Answer Similarity Scorer'].score).toBeGreaterThan(0.8);
});
it('should maintain consistency across runs', async () => {
const testData = {
input: "Define machine learning",
groundTruth: "Machine learning is a subset of AI that enables systems to learn and improve from experience"
};
// Run multiple times to check consistency
const results = await Promise.all([
runExperiment({ data: [testData], scorers: [scorer], target: myAgent }),
runExperiment({ data: [testData], scorers: [scorer], target: myAgent }),
runExperiment({ data: [testData], scorers: [scorer], target: myAgent })
]);
// Check that all runs produce similar scores (within 0.1 tolerance)
const scores = results.map(r => r.scores['Answer Similarity Scorer'].score);
const maxDiff = Math.max(...scores) - Math.min(...scores);
expect(maxDiff).toBeLessThan(0.1);
});
});
Custom configuration example
Customize the scorer behavior for specific use cases:
import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
import { runExperiment } from "@mastra/core/scores";
import { createAnswerSimilarityScorer } from "@mastra/evals/scorers/llm";
import { myAgent } from "./agent";
// Configure for strict exact matching with high scale
const strictScorer = createAnswerSimilarityScorer({
model: openai("gpt-4o-mini"),
options: {
exactMatchBonus: 0.5, // Higher bonus for exact matches
contradictionPenalty: 2.0, // Very strict on contradictions
missingPenalty: 0.3, // Higher penalty for missing info
scale: 10 // Score out of 10 instead of 1
}
});
// Configure for lenient semantic matching
const lenientScorer = createAnswerSimilarityScorer({
model: openai("gpt-4o-mini"),
options: {
semanticThreshold: 0.6, // Lower threshold for semantic matches
contradictionPenalty: 0.5, // More forgiving on minor contradictions
extraInfoPenalty: 0, // No penalty for extra information
requireGroundTruth: false // Allow missing ground truth
}
});
const result = await runExperiment({
data: [
{
input: "Explain photosynthesis",
groundTruth: "Photosynthesis is the process by which plants convert light energy into chemical energy"
}
],
scorers: [strictScorer, lenientScorer],
target: myAgent,
});
console.log('Strict scorer:', result.scores['Answer Similarity Scorer'].score); // Out of 10
console.log('Lenient scorer:', result.scores['Answer Similarity Scorer'].score); // Out of 1
Key Benefits
- Regression Testing: Catch when agent behavior changes unexpectedly
- Quality Assurance: Ensure responses meet expected standards
- Semantic Understanding: Goes beyond string matching to understand meaning
- Actionable Feedback: Clear explanations of what needs improvement
- CI/CD Ready: Designed for automated testing pipelines